Perpustakaan STIKep PPNI Jawa Barat

  • Home
  • Information
  • News
  • Help
  • Librarian
  • Member Area
  • Select Language :
    Arabic Bengali Brazilian Portuguese English Espanol German Indonesian Japanese Malay Persian Russian Thai Turkish Urdu

Search by :

ALL Author Subject ISBN/ISSN Advanced Search

Last search:

{{tmpObj[k].text}}
Image of Effectiveness of prone position with its moderating factors in non-intubated acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: a meta-analysis
Bookmark Share

Jurnal

Effectiveness of prone position with its moderating factors in non-intubated acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: a meta-analysis

Kosasih, Cecep Eli - Personal Name; Tan, Julianus Yudhistira - Personal Name; Togatorop, Via Eliadora - Personal Name; Koerniawan, Dheni - Personal Name;

Introduction: While numerous meta-analyses have explored the efficacy of awake prone position (APP), most have concentrated solely on intubation rate among Covid-19 patients without comprehensively identifying the influencing factors. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of APP along with its moderating factors on oxygenation, intubation rate, and mortality in non-intubated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search in PubMed, Web of Science, and CINAHL from inception to December 2022. JBI critical appraisal tools were used to assess the study quality. Random-effects model was employed to calculate pooled standardized mean difference for continuous outcomes and risk ratio for dichotomous outcomes.

Results: Among the 39 studies included, most patients were suffering from Covid-19, using conventional oxygen therapy, and receiving APP outside the ICU. APP significantly improved the PaO2/FiO2 ratio (SMD=0.70, 95% CI=0.51-0.88) and SpO2/FiO2 ratio (SMD=0.76, 95% CI=0.51-1.01), while also reducing the risk of intubation (RR=0.66, 95% CI=0.51-0.85) and mortality (RR=0.62, 95% CI=0.49-0.78). Factors including severity, respiratory device, body mass index, detail of position, use of medication assistance, total duration, follow-up time, position at follow-up, and study design significantly influence the effectiveness of APP. APP did not lead to significant improvements in length of stay and adverse events

Conclusions: APP is a safe and beneficial intervention, enhancing oxygenation and reducing intubation and mortality rates in non-intubated ARDS patients. Importantly, various patient and intervention characteristics should be taken into account when implementing APP. Further well-designed experimental studies are needed to strengthen the evidence base.


Availability

No copy data

Detail Information
Series Title
Jurnal Ners, Vol. 19 Issue 4 November 2024
Call Number
(05) 610.5 FAK j
Publisher
Surabaya : ., 2024
Collation
Hlm. 469-491
Language
English
ISBN/ISSN
1858-3598
Classification
(05) 610.5 FAK j
Content Type
-
Media Type
-
Carrier Type
-
Edition
Vol. 19 Issue 4 November 2024
Subject(s)
Mortality
length of stay
Oxygenation
ARDS
awake prone positioning
intubation rate
Specific Detail Info
-
Statement of Responsibility
-
Other version/related

No other version available

File Attachment
  • Jurnal Ners, Vol. 19 Issue 4 November 2024
Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment

Perpustakaan STIKep PPNI Jawa Barat
  • Information
  • Services
  • Librarian
  • Member Area

About Us

Perpustakaan STIKep PPNI Jawa Barat
Kampus 2 STIKep PPNI Jabar
Jl. Muhammad No. 34 Bandung - 40173
Telp. (022) 6004498
http://www.perpus.stikep-ppnijabar.ac.id/

Search

start it by typing one or more keywords for title, author or subject

Keep SLiMS Alive Want to Contribute?

© 2026 — Senayan Developer Community

Powered by SLiMS
Select the topic you are interested in
  • Computer Science, Information & General Works
  • Philosophy & Psychology
  • Religion
  • Social Sciences
  • Language
  • Pure Science
  • Applied Sciences
  • Art & Recreation
  • Literature
  • History & Geography
Icons made by Freepik from www.flaticon.com
Advanced Search